DevConsensus
Comparisons / Windsurf vs Kilo Code
AI coding tools · HN opinions Nov 2025 – Nov 2026

Windsurf vs Kilo Code: what developers actually say

Based on 67 opinions on Hacker News from developers who discussed these two, most of them first-hand users.

Windsurf
58%
approval · 36 opinions · 35 developers
last 90 days: –
Kilo Code
63%
approval · 31 opinions · 21 developers
last 90 days: –

Kilo Code edges ahead on approval, 63% versus 58%, on a smaller sample of 31 opinions versus 36. Its cost aspect is stronger at 4 positive and 1 negative, and customization is 4 positive with no negatives; Windsurf's cost split is 4 positive and 3 negative and its reliability is 0 positive and 3 negative. Windsurf has more firsthand reports, 31 versus 20, and more stated wins over Copilot and Cursor, so it remains the pick for a full AI IDE with tab completion. Direct A-versus-B evidence is absent: 0 users picked either over the other, so this comparison rests on separate comment sets.

Choose Windsurf if

  • Want a full AI IDE with built-in tab completion
  • Value frequent free models and promotional pricing
  • Accept mixed pricing and reliability reports for a broader feature set

Choose Kilo Code if

  • Want an open-source VS Code extension
  • Want to switch model providers mid-task
  • Care most about customization and low running cost

Where each one wins and loses

PraiseComplaintsA = WindsurfB = Kilo Code
Cost & pricing
A
3
4
B
1
4
UX
A
2
4
B
1
2
Reliability
A
3
B
3
2
Autonomy
B
3
2
Customization
B
4

Side by side

WindsurfKilo Code
Approval
58%
63%
Last 90 days––
Opinions3631
First-hand users3120
TypeAI IDEIDE extension
Made byCognitionOpen source
WebsiteVisit ↗Visit ↗

Related comparisons