Zed vs Aider: what developers actually say
Based on 491 opinions on Hacker News from developers who discussed these two, most of them first-hand users.
Zed comes out ahead on evidence volume: 457 opinions from 378 authors against Aider's 34 opinions from 39 authors. Approval is effectively tied at 59% for Zed and 60% for Aider, but Aider has no 90-day figure and a sample small enough that one comment moves the rate several points. Zed's strengths are UX (119 positive, 56 negative) and speed (62 positive, 16 negative), while its weak spot is reliability (16 positive, 32 negative). Aider's strongest aspect is code quality (5 positive, 1 negative), with little data on anything else. Pick Aider when the terminal is the workflow and local data handling or small reviewable commits matter more than editor features; pick Zed when you want an editor with agent orchestration and the UX is the main draw.
Choose Zed if
- Want an editor-first workflow with a built-in agent panel
- Care most about UX and speed
- Want the larger base of user reports
Choose Aider if
- Work mainly from the terminal
- Want data kept local and .gitignore respected
- Prefer small changes committed for review